ASHA Learning Pass

Log in and check out the Dashboard to view featured courses.

Filter Courses By
Experience
Instructional Level [clear]
Results 1 - 10 of 18
Presenter(s): Kellyn Dailey Hall, PhD, CCC-SLP; Sarah Marie Bishop, MA, CCC-SLP; Maribeth Plankers, MS CCC-SLP; Leslie W Johnson, PhD, CCC-SLP
Credit(s): PDHs: 2.0, ASHA CEUs*: 0.2
Summary: This course offers a comprehensive introduction to artificial intelligence (AI) for school-based SLPs. You will explore foundational concepts, practical applications for school settings, and ethical decision-making frameworks aligned with ASHA's Code of Ethics. You'll walk through case studies and demonstrations that highlight strategies to incorporate AI tools for lesson planning, data collection, and workload management. At the same time, you'll learn to critically evaluate the limitations and considerations for using AI, including ensuring privacy, recognizing bias, and maintaining the central role of clinical judgment. By the end of the course, you will be prepared to integrate AI into your practice responsibly and effectively to enhance student outcomes and workload management.
Presenter(s): Kathryn A Bayles, PhD; Kimberly C McCullough, PhD, CCC-SLP
Credit(s): PDHs: 1.0, ASHA CEUs*: 0.1
Summary: This session focuses on the various diseases associated with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), their hallmark cognitive-linguistic deficits, and best practice guidelines for SLPs assessing and treating MCI.
Presenter(s): Adria L Thompson, MA, CCC-SLP; Steven Barbieri,
Credit(s): PDHs: 1.0, ASHA CEUs*: 0.1
Summary: In this course, enter into a conversation between an SLP and an individual living with dementia about the experience of being on both sides of the provision of speech services. Since individuals living with communication disorders are the true experts, this session will allow firsthand insight into effective interventions, challenges in navigating the medical system, and compensatory strategies that have supported self-advocacy. This presentation is an invitation to deepen your understanding, empathy, and skills to elevate the care and support you provide to your patients with dementia.
Product graphic with text, Maximize Your Impact With the 3:1 Service Delivery Model
Presenter(s): Christina D Bradburn, PhD, CCC-SLP
Credit(s): PDHs: 0.5, ASHA CEUs*: 0.05
Summary: School-based SLPs are under constant pressure with growing workloads, and it's no secret that back-to-back scheduling can lead to burnout, compliance issues, and compromised service quality. The 3:1 model ensures students receive the comprehensive support they need-not just face-to-face time. This course explores effective implementation strategies for optimizing your daily schedule and creating IEPs that truly reflect your services. The course aims to empower SLPs to provide high-impact support without sacrificing quality or compliance so you can work smarter, not harder.
Credit(s): PDHs: 4.5, ASHA CEUs*: 0.45
Summary: This journal self-study course examines remote treatment for aphasia, a topic that several researchers explored at the 51st Clinical Aphasiology Conference (CAC) in North Carolina. Articles examine the effectiveness of telepractice delivery of three types of aphasia treatment: conversation group treatment, Combined Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech Treatment, and Sound Production Treatment. The articles compare outcomes of the treatments when administered remotely vs. in-person.
Credit(s): PDHs: 7.0, ASHA CEUs*: 0.7
Summary: This journal self-study course addresses the effectiveness of various aphasia treatments, a topic that many researchers explored at the 51st Clinical Aphasiology Conference (CAC) in North Carolina. Published in a special issue of the American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, these articles examine specific interventions for particular patient populations, including individuals with stroke-induced aphasia, those with acquired apraxia of speech, those with anomia, and those with Alzheimer's dementia.
Credit(s): PDHs: 1.5, ASHA CEUs*: 0.15
Summary: This course is composed of a journal article that discusses person-centered assessment methods and tools for primary progressive aphasia (PPA). Using case studies, the authors define and present components of person-centered assessment, outline the R.A.I.S.E. assessment framework, and discuss its practical applications for assessment and treatment of individuals with PPA as well as for working with their care partners.
Presenter(s): Bethany L Kusek , MA, CCC-SLP; Andrea Elise Kremeier, MS, CCC-SLP, CBIS; Jett Mickelsen Stenson, MS, CCC-SLP
Credit(s): PDHs: 0.5, ASHA CEUs*: 0.05
Summary: In the era of COVID-19, clinicians in health care settings have faced challenges in the evaluation and treatment of a new patient population - those who have had COVID-19 - requiring us to reframe our current treatment techniques. This session focuses on reinventing the SLP's approach to treatment of respiratory activity tolerance for motor speech.
Product cover image
Presenter(s): Stacey L Pavelko, PhD, CCC-SLP, FNAP
Credit(s): PDHs: 2.0, ASHA CEUs*: 0.2
Summary: When providing services for elementary students with speech sound disorders, you might ask: Is pull-out the best service delivery model for this student? How can I collaborate with teachers to promote generalization? Would classroom-based services be appropriate? This on demand webinar will review models of co-teaching and apply them to specific students and situations, explore practical resources to enhance collaboration, and guide you through developing a plan to increase effective collaboration in your work environment.
Presenter(s): Nicole Cruse, PhD; Nicholas Behn; Victor Piotto; Carl A Coelho, PhD, BC-ANCDS
Credit(s): PDHs: 0.5, ASHA CEUs*: 0.05
Summary: This session discusses a study that examined the feasibility of telehealth administration of narrative and procedural discourse tasks to individuals with TBI and matched controls. Results support the feasibility of collecting discourse samples via telehealth. Although the participants' discourse performance distinguished the TBI and control groups on the narrative task, no differences between the groups were noted for the procedural task.
<< < 1 2 >>